Jason Gill 6 Posted January 11, 2018 Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 Hi all, I got both of these kits for Christmas and so I thought I would do a comparison build on the tractor itself. I know there are a few differences, not least that one has a trailer and the other has a load carrier with a crane in it but I thought it might be of interest to some. I also got the Army Wheels in detail book and its pretty good so I will be using that for reference and maybe some detailing if I can fit it in. I doubt it'll be a fast build, may take me all yea for all I know as work is busy and once the flying season starts that usually takes up a lot of my free time. Lets hope it allows me to get some lost mojo back though So for starters this is what I have, hope to start building them over the next few days. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Brown 7,762 Posted January 11, 2018 Report Share Posted January 11, 2018 I'll be watching this with interest as I have one of the transporter kits. The kits look very, very, nice, if not a little bit intimidating in the box, so I'll be keen to see how your builds progress. I sent off for and received the other day the replacement radiator matrix that Thunder offer. Well worth the €1 they ask to cover postage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jason Gill 6 Posted January 12, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2018 Thanks Paul. I also got the replacement radiator for 1 Euro. Not sure this will be a fast couple of builds but I'll do my best Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grunhertz 17,460 Posted January 12, 2018 Report Share Posted January 12, 2018 Will be watching looks interesting Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Toolmaker 1,759 Posted January 13, 2018 Report Share Posted January 13, 2018 Hi Jason, those should keep you busy for a while. I’ve seen a couple of completed versions of the IBG model and it looks a great kit with as much potential as you could want. I’ll be keeping a watch on your progress as I have a “thing” for heavy haulage type vehicles. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jason Gill 6 Posted January 14, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2018 Thanks all. The real building starts today. Will try to get something up in next few days. The Thunder Models website seems to say they arent too chuffed with IBG as they didnt tell them the Pioneers were in IBG's plans. Still, choice is always good methinks so hope I can help people choose their favourite one somehow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jason Gill 6 Posted January 15, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2018 So, I finally got something done this weekend on both of the engines. I went slightly off instructions, as you do, so that I could compare the engines as sub assemblies. There are quite a few differences but I will discuss each engine on its own before moving to the comparison. The IBG Engine. The IBG Engine is spread across a couple of sprues (G and H) along with 2 pieces from the PE Fret, notably a bracket and the cooling fan. It's a pretty simple affair and on its own it looks like quite a decent shot at an engine. However, once compared to the Thunder Models engine it does look to be a little bit simplified due to the lack of some details and some of the pipework. More of that later. The IBG plastic feels a bit soft and when cut with sprue cutters doesn't give that satisfying click like perhaps Tamiya plastic does but otherwise its fine to work with, sands well and I had no problem with the liquid cement I use, Slaters MekPak. The PE is good, bends well and is quite sturdy. The lack of detail on the fan stands out a bit on the PE but one is unlikely to see much of it once the model is complete even if the engine panels are left off the model. The instructions are clear, there weren't any issues there at all and I do like the fact that the completed assembly at the end of each stage is shown, I think thats a very nice touch that other manufacturers ought to copy if possible. Altogether not bad and looking at the references it looks to be pretty accurate other than some of the simplicities. The Thunder Models Engine. The Thunder Models Engine is spread across quite a few sprues (A, B, C D and E) along with 2 pieces from the PE Fret, a filler cap and the cooling fan. Compared to the IBG engine it is a lot more detailed, and seems to have more detail in that the parts themselves seem to be more intricate. The engine is also broken down into smaller pieces, with the engine block being 7 pieces compared to the IBG one which is 4. All in more detail and more intricate than the IBG one. The Thunder Models plastic is harder, perhaps more brittle and when cut with sprue cutters it does give that satisfying click, it also sands well and I also had no issues using MekPak. I did manage to snap the fanbelt (and a piece of it was claimed by the carpet monster whcih I will need to fix. Its clearly visible in the phot'o's here. The PE is a little thinner and more fragile than the IBG etch. It bends well but feels a bit flimsy. There is also a lack of detail on the fan so maybe this is just what the real thing is like, though references seem to show otherwise. The instructions are pretty clear though I think not as good as the IBG ones. I think they could, in something that could be as complex as an engine, be a little more clear in places. It's a small issue but given the number of pieces I think they could have put them all on a couple of sprues like the IBG one, even with more parts in play here. It's a personal thing but jumping between sprues for small fiddly parts is slightly annoying. Someone with a small bench and limited space may get a little annoyed by the back and forth between sprues. What I like the the IBG model is lacking is the callouts for paint by Thunder Models. They are all MIG colours and there is no conversion chart but this shouldn't be too difficult to convert to your paint preference. In summary then the Thunder Models looks to be more detailed and accurate than the IBG one and is less simplified but spread across more sprues and has less sturdy PE. Side by Side When the engines are seen side by side the differences are really easy to see. The Thunder Models engine looks much more impressive. The other surprise is that the Thunder Models engine is also larger, noticeably so when side by side. Which one is correct i do not know as the references I have do not give dimensions for the engine itself. They may be different engines, though I doubt it given the similarities, even when taking into account the difference in detail. With respect to detail its a clear win for the Thunder Models kit. However, the IBG kit has more sturdy PE and for those not bothered about displaying the engine is probably good enough. In my case I want to open the IBG engine up and close up the Thunder Models one which had me thinking of swapping the engines between kits (to have the mode detailed Thunder Models engine in the IBG Tractor) on show. However, the size difference may be an issue there so some detailing of the IBG engine, using the Thunder Models one as the reference may be on the cards. Hopefully that gives everyone an idea of what it's like so far. Neither kit so far has major issues, other than losing some of the fan belt on the Thunder Models kit, which I'll probably remedy at some stage. More to come soon I hope with the Chassis and suspension to come before the builds split when the Tractor gets its crane and the Transporter gets its trailer turntable fitted. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grunhertz 17,460 Posted January 16, 2018 Report Share Posted January 16, 2018 This is really useful Jason. Thanks for sharing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rory 298 Posted October 31, 2020 Report Share Posted October 31, 2020 Can you tell me more about the replacement radiator matrix please, like where you got it and cost? Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.